I'm Right Minded, A Right Brainer like ME is Conceptual

I only see me succeeding in the conceptual world if I be creative and understanding to new styles and new ideals. I will have to be open-minded to divers opinions, thinking and ways of life. Being embracing of new methods of accomplishing any given task at hand. I am likely to succeed financially if i stay creative, and improve my creativity skills. I should also be practicing my cognitive skills if i want to be competitive as a thinker.   

I computer can not do the creative things better than me. A computer can not even be creative. It has no chance in being a creator. I was created as a tool for the human creator. A computer can only assist a creative person. The creative person being the essential and independent factor. As long as i have skills and creativity that is in demand i will have job in the work force.

I would use design to get involve and engaged in the sense say for example if i were the director of a film i would also be the choreographer on projection. Thats and example of me being helpful to the team and getting involve.

I would use stories to be narrative in my structures and functions. I'll try to have some connectivity in my productivity.

I would use symphony to be more innovative. For example, im a producer for a music video and i needed a dummy rocket ship i would not buy it i would just build it.

I would use empathy to  add emotions to my products and services. For example i am a ceo for toy company and i decide to have the children emotionally attached to the toys, and we find out what are the most attractive child safe aromas for boys and girls their own group. I used intuition by thinking about the future by thinking about what if, what if we added amoras to toys to get that child like attractions.

I would add play into my mixture of success by always staying joyful, cheerful and easy to work with.

I would always keep meaning in my craft and talent to keep passion for power to over accomplish and out do the next guy or the competition. Or just to do what the boss wants but more.
 

"No child left behind" and "LEAP" Compare & Contrast

The similarities and comparisons out weight the contrast. The contrast the that the two organization have is the fact that one is instated by the government and the other is an organization all by its self but tries to get back up from the government. No child left behind is a government act that was instated. It was made to uphold some educational reforms. It was and still is an act to educated and better our youth. That is the same thing that the LEAP program proceeds to do. The LEAP organization doesn't just want to educate the youth and uplift our inner cities, but they also want through education and a strong guidance the child will grow up to be a better citizen also. One of the contrast between these two ideals if you will call it that, is the fact that LEAP is nonprofitable where as the No Child Left Behind Act cost us some money. No Child Left Behind Act aims at the student in the classroom and focuses on the intelligence progression of that individual student. However, LEAP is doing something different, they are trying to give each child a chance to be a student. No Child Left Behind & LEAP are doing two different things but they both make it possible for one another to do their job. LEAP basically gets the child in the classroom to be taught as a student, and then the No Child Left Behind act goes in to have the teachers make sure every student learn the material personally. These two organizations together have become an educational circle.

Video & the Radio Star, COMM333 Music Video

Did video kill the radio star?

No, it just added competition for the radio star.

It also added another plateau for the radio star to shine one.

Now the radio star can add another playing field to perform on.

Media Studies Comm 403 W1/18/12

It is a repertoire of competences that enable people to analyze, evaluate, and create messages in a wide variety of media modes, genres, and forms for profitable or non-profitable causes.(Some info is from Wikipedia in protest to SOPA & PIPA 1/18/12) 


TO me i feel that media literacy is all art mediums in a competition or profession to create messages for whatever causes through whatever genres.  


It is basically the literacy that was created specifically for the media world. 

November 16th Blog Assignment due November 18th.

David Ogilvy and Rosser Reeves & Hillman Curtis designers and advertisers. 

1. They both share the idea to please their client as much as possible. The both use the skill of attracting the viewer or the customer more in depth or to a deeper level or a wider perspective. 

2. The distinct differences is that the advertisers do not care about the mass consumers like the designers care about the viewers. The designers actually put some soul, emotions or personal views into the work. Like for example it was said that mean goal of the advertisers were to sell the client's product or service, and if your mean goal is to sell than your best interest is not in the buyer/customer. The designers actually look for what the viewers might want to see or experience whereas the advertisers do not care about what the customers want and they try to dictate what the customers should want.  

Gun Control The Signifiers

Monica's Comm406

The video below signifies that gun crime is a serious and very deadly problem in Philadelphia. The signifier is the clipe of the two kids shooting someone on the bus with automatic weapons and the music. 

The video below signifies that Harry is a good guy. The signifier is the music and the speaker speaking positive about Harry. 

The video below signifies that Romney is not a good guy. The signifier is the music, the words, the black and white images and the dark colors. 

How To Speak To The People: Words You Use: Song Airline Ad Campaign & Rosser Reeves political campaign

I feel like the Song Airline campaign contrasted from the strategies seen in the political campaign videos of Rosser Reeves. They did not use the right techniques. Song Airlines did not persuade the people the way the political candidates did in the videos. They tried to used pathos but they did not back it up with any understanding of the brand. They did not address to the public what was the product or the service they were trying to sell. The only thing Song airlines did was give a sense of calmness and happiness. They should have directed their viewers to the source of that calm and happy feel, which would have been images of the actual airlines and airplanes. Their campaign was too vague. It left most people very clueless. Especially for a new brand coming into the marketing world, the vague approach it not the smartest even if you're using pathos. It was a waste of the pathos' technique. They should have used some good ol' brand description.

  

Unlike the Song airlines campaign, the Rosser Reeves political commercials were a success for some candidates. President Eisenhower was having a hell of a victory using the right language and simplicity  ethos. He also used songs and sing-alongs. Eisenhower played the good guy that didn't know the answer but knew what he would do. He talked about changed like Obama and sold his credibility. The Eisenhower ads connected with the people's understanding and some times used logos to back him up. For example he said because he knew how to run troops in a war he could also run a country. You have  to get an understand of what or who you are through to your target audience before you can use the ethos, pathos, or logos methode.